JBL and Harman – AXPONA 2017
by Rafe Arnott
Every time I hear the word “JBL” mentioned I instantly think about their behemoth David Smith-engineered 4435, and 4430 Bi-Radial studio monitors that were introduced in 1981. These were the longest-running professional speaker in production from JBL (1981~1999), and also one of the company’s most successful designs. I had a mild obsession with them for a few months, and devoured as much information on them as I could. I scoured the Internet for used pairs, but they would always be thousands of miles away, usually somewhere in the United States (I’m in Canada), and in need of repairs – never mind the shipping costs (and risks) – so price-wise they became a bit of a bugaboo for me because they would require a significant investment up front just to purchase, and ship them… and then significant investment in acquiring replacement parts, and finding someone who was qualified to service/repair them. Alas, that’s when my fervour for them began to wane, and I moved on to other loudspeakers, but I never forgot the unrequited love affair I had with JBL those years ago. So when I walked into the Audio Solutions room at the Westin O’Hare during AXPONA and saw JBL’s flagship Project Everest DD67000 horn-loaded loudspeakers ($35,000 USD) being fed intravenously by a pair of Mark Levinson No. 536 power amplifiers (400 watts into eight Ohms, $30,000 USD/pair) I was stopped dead in my tracks.
These were (in a sense) the updated/modified reincarnation of the 4435/4430 in my mind, and so I had to pay respect.
While of fairly high sensitivity, JBL transducers typically like power, so the No. 536 power amps had the pair well in hand, and a stack of Levinson electronics including the No. 519 Audio Player ($20,000 USD), which was in charge as the digital source while I was in the room sounded transparently happy. The JBLs are simply massive, weighing in at more than 300lbs apiece, the cabinets boast twinned 15-inch bass drivers, are rated at 96dB, and pressurize rooms in wavelengths of 30Hz to 50KHz. They are a joy to look at, and I have to say I wasn’t the only in the room with a lustful eye upon them. These are big speakers for a really big sound, and this combination didn’t disappoint as they easily filled the space with a huge sound stage, and a sense of scale to instruments, and voices that was proportionately life-size in weight, presence, and realism. Finesse, power, visceral slam, and speed made this a noteworthy system in Chicago.
For those about to rock (with JBL), I salute you.
For that system I would have torn off the clothes and danced nude in some hedonistic fashion!
the JBL might be good…………..Mark Levinson…………..yikes !
The Mark Levinson No. 326S is one of the best preamplifiers ever.
you gotta listen to Chord preamps……….sonically, they don’t exist…….i bet even Gamut would be easily better than Mark Levinson…………
I’m sure they are great and technology keeps advancing, but the fact that the 326S was introduced many years ago is important. In my opinion it will be a classic just like their famous 25W per channel ML-2 monoblocks.
My Realistic Coronet 500 all in one system beats the pants off JBL, ML and Chord
Fook Me Running, have you heard the ML electronics referenced in this article? I’ve a friend who wants to sell his Chord 3000 since he heard my system.
Fook Me Running, where did you here the ML electronics referenced in this article? I’ve a friend who wants to sell his Chord 3000 since he heard my system.